Our mission is to connect our community, promote healing and dare to dream of a truer, braver future for Hope & Home. 

Case Number: 1:2021cv01320
Court: Colorado District Court
Date Filed: 05/13/2021

Lawsuits are open to the public and can be viewed at pacer.uscourts.gov.
The website costs money to access. We will be posting all documents on this website if you would like to know the latest information.

BALLAGE v. HOPE & HOME

Date of last filing: 09/16/2022

5/13/21
Olivia Ballage filed a complaint against Hope & Home alleging Ross Wright engaged in discrimination based on sex, race and disability. (Doc. 1)
10/20/21
Hope & Home file their answer to the complaint, denying all allegations of sex discrimination, race discrimination, disability discrimination, and retaliation. (Doc. 19)
Hope & Home file a motion to dismiss sex and race discrimination claims and explains why these allegations should be dismissed. (Doc. 20)
11/10/21
 Olivia Ballage opposes the defendant’s motion to dismiss and shares specific examples of why these allegations should not be dismissed. (Doc. 22)
11/29/21
Hope & Home's reply in support of partial motion to dismiss. (Doc. 23)

NOTABLE EVENTS

08/29/22
Judge ruled on partial motion to dismiss. (Doc. 28)

1. Allegations concerning other employees. "The Court will consider Plaintiff’s allegations concerning other employees in evaluating the sufficiency of her Title VII hostile work environment claims."

2. Disparate Treatment. Ms. Ballage claims paychecks were withheld after maternity leave. Hope & Home denied withholding paychecks, but did "not address Plaintiff’s disparate treatment claims, at all." The court finds that those claims should PROCEED.

3. Sexually hostile work environment. "The Court finds that Plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to support a finding or inference of either severe or pervasive sexual harassment." Hope & Home's request to dismiss is DENIED.

"The Court also finds that Plaintiff has adequately alleged a claim for constructive
discharge resulting from a sexually hostile work environment."

4. Racially Hostile Work Environment. "While a close call, the Court finds that these allegations... are enough to state a plausible claim... particularly given that Plaintiff alleges more than one protected trait. "Hope & Home's motion to dismiss is DENIED. 

5. The Title VII Retaliation Claims.  Ms. Ballage did not provide sufficient allegations to show that she reported discrimination while employed.  Plaintiff’s Title VII retaliation claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. 

6. Disability discrimination. Hope & Home provided no argument for the dismissal of these claims. Remaining disability claims PROCEED.

Philip A. Brimmer, presiding
Michael E. Hegarty, referral

Documents can be viewed by clicking on the description link.

Doc. No.

Entire case History

Dates

Description

1

Filed & Entered: 05/13/2021

2

Filed & Entered: 05/13/2021

Case Assigned to Judge

3

Filed & Entered: 05/13/2021
Terminated: 06/03/2021

4

Filed & Entered: 05/14/2021

5

Filed: 05/24/2021
Entered: 05/25/2021

6

Filed: 05/24/2021
Entered: 05/27/2021

7

Filed: 05/31/2021
Entered: 06/01/2021

8

Filed: 06/01/2021
Entered: 06/02/2021
Terminated: 06/03/2021

9

Filed: 06/03/2021
Entered: 06/04/2021

10

Filed: 06/09/2021
Entered: 06/10/2021

12

Filed & Entered: 06/23/2021

13

Filed: 06/23/2021
Entered: 06/24/2021

14

Filed & Entered: 06/24/2021

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

15

Filed & Entered: 06/24/2021

16

Filed & Entered: 09/30/2021

17

Filed & Entered: 10/14/2021

18

Filed & Entered: 10/20/2021

19

Filed & Entered: 10/20/2021

20

Filed & Entered: 10/20/2021

21

Filed & Entered: 10/20/2021

21

Filed & Entered: 10/20/2021

Full docket text for document 21:
MEMORANDUM regarding [20] Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hope & Home. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/20/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec)

22

Filed: 11/10/2021
Entered: 11/15/2021

23

Filed & Entered: 11/29/2021

25

Filed & Entered: 01/14/2022

Full docket text for document 25:
MINUTE ORDER: Discovery in this matter is STAYED pending a ruling on the [20] Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall file a joint status report within ten days of a ruling on the motion to dismiss, if any portion of the case remains, to advise whether a scheduling conference should be set. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/14/22. Text Only Entry (kmtlc2)

26

Filed & Entered: 02/01/2022

 Reassigning Magistrate Judge

27

Filed & Entered: 07/07/2022

 Reassigning Magistrate Judge

28

Filed & Entered: 08/29/2022
Terminated: 09/16/2022

29

Filed & Entered: 09/08/2022

30

Filed & Entered: 09/12/2022

31

Filed & Entered: 09/13/2022

Full docket text for document 31:
MINUTE ORDER: The [20] Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss remains pending before Chief Judge Brimmer. Accordingly, the [30] Amended Answer is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1. The parties shall file a joint status report within ten days of Chief Judge Brimmer's ruling on this Court's [28] Recommendation, if any portion of the case remains, to advise whether a scheduling conference should be set. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 09/13/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)

32

Filed & Entered: 09/16/2022

33

Filed & Entered: 09/16/2022

Full docket text for document 33:
MINUTE ORDER: The [20] Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss remains pending before Chief Judge Brimmer. Accordingly, the [30] Amended Answer is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1. The parties shall file a joint status report within ten days of Chief Judge Brimmer's ruling on this Court's [28] Recommendation, if any portion of the case remains, to advise whether a scheduling conference should be set. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 09/13/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)

34

Filed & Entered: 09/16/2022